Comments on: Mentira! Rep. Loretta Sanchez Should Come Clean Before it’s Too Late http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994 Rants and ruminations by a classical liberal with radical Chicano tendencies Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:03:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Rey Lopez-Calderon http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3611 Rey Lopez-Calderon Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:17:12 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3611 Jackal, I missed your response. Any proof that Saylor is a "known liar?" Jackal,

I missed your response. Any proof that Saylor is a “known liar?”

]]> By: Jackal http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3418 Jackal Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:22:19 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3418 Did a little research. John Saylor, the moron in the picture with Loretta, is a known liar. He's one of these Washington name-droppers who managed to snap a few photos with a congresswoman and then claim he had an affair. He is just like the balloon boy father or the White House gate crashers--professional attention hog. Did a little research. John Saylor, the moron in the picture with Loretta, is a known liar. He’s one of these Washington name-droppers who managed to snap a few photos with a congresswoman and then claim he had an affair. He is just like the balloon boy father or the White House gate crashers–professional attention hog.

]]> By: The Jackal http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3323 The Jackal Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:21:56 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3323 Maybe so,Adriana. All in good time. I'm sure she'll tell her story sooner or later. Van Tran will probably make an issue out of the relationship, but by the time that happens they'll probably be married. For now, Loretta and Jack are just trying to be happy and make a life together. Maybe so,Adriana. All in good time. I’m sure she’ll tell her story sooner or later. Van Tran will probably make an issue out of the relationship, but by the time that happens they’ll probably be married. For now, Loretta and Jack are just trying to be happy and make a life together.

]]> By: adriana http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3311 adriana Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:45:23 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3311 "Ok, fair enough, Rey. Sanchez can’t blame you for raising these questions–either about Saylor or conflicts. But the story with Einwechter is that he split with his wife and filed for divorce. Happens every day in America. He and Sanchez have been together for years. If it was messy in the past, that’s all been sorted out." Why doesn't Sanchez just come out and acknowledge Einwechter then? I tried to ask her about this, as Einwechter has arranged meetings with the Congresswoman on behalf of his client, the Kurdistan Regional Government. You can see that here: http://foreignlobbying.org/legislator/Sanchez,%20Loretta/ How convenient! But instead of just answering the bloggers' questions, Sanchez doesn't say anything. Now it has also been alleged that Sanchez hooked up with Einwechter when he was still in the army and married -- that is against Article 134 in UCMJ. She of all people, should know that it isn't cool to hook up with a military guy who has a bunch of kids. How is that good for military morale? Yes, divorce happens all the time, and it is wonderful that Einwechter is supporting his many children. But if things occurred as alleged, then Sanchez has some explaining to do. “Ok, fair enough, Rey. Sanchez can’t blame you for raising these questions–either about Saylor or conflicts. But the story with Einwechter is that he split with his wife and filed for divorce. Happens every day in America. He and Sanchez have been together for years. If it was messy in the past, that’s all been sorted out.”

Why doesn’t Sanchez just come out and acknowledge Einwechter then? I tried to ask her about this, as Einwechter has arranged meetings with the Congresswoman on behalf of his client, the Kurdistan Regional Government. You can see that here:

http://foreignlobbying.org/legislator/Sanchez,%20Loretta/

How convenient!

But instead of just answering the bloggers’ questions, Sanchez doesn’t say anything. Now it has also been alleged that Sanchez hooked up with Einwechter when he was still in the army and married — that is against Article 134 in UCMJ. She of all people, should know that it isn’t cool to hook up with a military guy who has a bunch of kids. How is that good for military morale?

Yes, divorce happens all the time, and it is wonderful that Einwechter is supporting his many children. But if things occurred as alleged, then Sanchez has some explaining to do.

]]> By: The Jackal http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3304 The Jackal Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:47:50 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3304 Ok, fair enough, Rey. Sanchez can't blame you for raising these questions--either about Saylor or conflicts. But the story with Einwechter is that he split with his wife and filed for divorce. Happens every day in America. He and Sanchez have been together for years. If it was messy in the past, that's all been sorted out. Einwechter is supporting his kids and has done everything legally. He even has a good relationship with his ex-wife. Saylor has been spreading lies about his alleged relationship with Sanchez. That was my main point. If you look into it, you'll find that Einwechter is a lawyer and has not used his relationship with Sanchez to advance his career or business interests in any way. There is no conflict there. I don't know about Saylor's lobbying, but he has no romantic relationship with Sanchez. Thanks. Ok, fair enough, Rey. Sanchez can’t blame you for raising these questions–either about Saylor or conflicts. But the story with Einwechter is that he split with his wife and filed for divorce. Happens every day in America. He and Sanchez have been together for years. If it was messy in the past, that’s all been sorted out. Einwechter is supporting his kids and has done everything legally. He even has a good relationship with his ex-wife. Saylor has been spreading lies about his alleged relationship with Sanchez. That was my main point. If you look into it, you’ll find that Einwechter is a lawyer and has not used his relationship with Sanchez to advance his career or business interests in any way. There is no conflict there. I don’t know about Saylor’s lobbying, but he has no romantic relationship with Sanchez. Thanks.

]]> By: Rey Lopez-Calderon http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3298 Rey Lopez-Calderon Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:34:58 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3298 Sorry Jackal, if only Loretta would say what you said, then we could all move on...she has yet to address the conflict of interest claims people made even about her committed relationship with Einwechter when he was part of another "committed" relationship. Again its not about the love its about claims of corruption. She should just come clean instead of having her friends and lackeys troll the blogosphere. Sorry Jackal, if only Loretta would say what you said, then we could all move on…she has yet to address the conflict of interest claims people made even about her committed relationship with Einwechter when he was part of another “committed” relationship. Again its not about the love its about claims of corruption. She should just come clean instead of having her friends and lackeys troll the blogosphere.

]]> By: The Jackal http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3294 The Jackal Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:06:35 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3294 Saylor is a pathetic pretender who claims to have scored with Loretta, but he's not even in the game. He's not even her friend. At best, he's an acquaintance. These innocent photos mean nothing. Loretta has been in a committed, exclusive relationship with her long-term partner, Jack Einwechter, for years. Everything else is bull. There is no "affair" and no conflict of interest. Just a lobbyist moron (Saylor) who has been grossly exaggerating his relations with a congresswoman. That's typical lobbyist behavior. Move on, please. Saylor is a pathetic pretender who claims to have scored with Loretta, but he’s not even in the game. He’s not even her friend. At best, he’s an acquaintance. These innocent photos mean nothing. Loretta has been in a committed, exclusive relationship with her long-term partner, Jack Einwechter, for years. Everything else is bull. There is no “affair” and no conflict of interest. Just a lobbyist moron (Saylor) who has been grossly exaggerating his relations with a congresswoman. That’s typical lobbyist behavior. Move on, please.

]]> By: adriana http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3289 adriana Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:50:59 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3289 Thank you for posting these CP. Thank you for posting these CP.

]]> By: Rey Lopez-Calderon http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3288 Rey Lopez-Calderon Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:44:48 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3288 Kelly, I'm sure the kids who desperately need the Dream Act will not be surprised by your lack of caring; they are used to it. Kelly, I’m sure the kids who desperately need the Dream Act will not be surprised by your lack of caring; they are used to it.

]]> By: Kelly http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994&cpage=1#comment-3285 Kelly Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:11:13 +0000 http://cockroachpeople.com/?p=994#comment-3285 Who cares. I am still voting for her because I don't want Van Tran to win. Furthermore, I don't care if she hasn't sponsored The Dream Act. Who cares. I am still voting for her because I don’t want Van Tran to win. Furthermore, I don’t care if she hasn’t sponsored The Dream Act.

]]>